Who is online?
In total there are 3 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 3 Guests

None

Most users ever online was 31 on Sat Nov 16, 2013 9:31 pm
Poll
July 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Calendar Calendar

Twitter Feed

Should Battlefield be yearly?

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Should Battlefield be yearly?

Post by Willow on Wed Nov 20, 2013 11:46 pm

an analyst asked EA http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-11-20-should-battlefield-be-an-annualised-series-mulls-ea

My belief is NO. Only a few games work on a yearly basis, sports usually, Wrestling, football

People will get bored if it was released every year

what do the rest of you think?

_________________
avatar
Willow
Moderator
Moderator

Posts : 1414
Join date : 2012-03-11
Age : 38
Location : Macclesfield

Back to top Go down

Re: Should Battlefield be yearly?

Post by SturmKommando on Thu Nov 21, 2013 3:40 am

No! im a huge fan but i would rather keep it at 2 years intervals with downloadable content at set intervals.

Weirdly on BF3 i ended up back playing the original maps more than any others.....

_________________


obey the orders of your Hauptsturmf├╝hrer!!!
avatar
SturmKommando
Member
Member

Posts : 265
Join date : 2012-04-11
Age : 40
Location : Deep behind enemy lines, watching, waiting....

Back to top Go down

Re: Should Battlefield be yearly?

Post by Kamikaze on Thu Nov 21, 2013 4:40 am

NO!

2 years I feel is still a push for putting new features into the game. DLC/Premium is great to keep people interested. The close quarters is the map pack that kept me coming back the most, wasn't too sure about the others tbh.

_________________
avatar
Kamikaze
Owner
Owner

Posts : 678
Join date : 2012-03-10
Age : 20
Location : Isle of Wight

http://battlefieldx.forumotion.co.uk

Back to top Go down

Re: Should Battlefield be yearly?

Post by SturmKommando on Thu Nov 21, 2013 4:55 am

It was metro for me but a lot of people didnt seem to like it as they struggled with tactics.

For me it was the ultimate map as it wasnt so big that you could creep around the edges to flank people, you had to go all out as a team to hold area B (in conquest) and that took a lot of working together.

i also didnt care about being called a noob for setting up a heavy machine gun on a bi-pod and nailing people left, right and center. if those kind of players dont think thats a sensible tactic and one used in real situations then they are dumb as buggery, i could hold back the opposition across large areas of the map and allow my team mates to attack - common sense no?

_________________


obey the orders of your Hauptsturmf├╝hrer!!!
avatar
SturmKommando
Member
Member

Posts : 265
Join date : 2012-04-11
Age : 40
Location : Deep behind enemy lines, watching, waiting....

Back to top Go down

Re: Should Battlefield be yearly?

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum