Should Battlefield be yearly?

an analyst asked EA http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2013-11-20-should-battlefield-be-an-annualised-series-mulls-ea

My belief is NO. Only a few games work on a yearly basis, sports usually, Wrestling, football

People will get bored if it was released every year

what do the rest of you think?

No! im a huge fan but i would rather keep it at 2 years intervals with downloadable content at set intervals.

Weirdly on BF3 i ended up back playing the original maps more than any others.....

NO!

2 years I feel is still a push for putting new features into the game. DLC/Premium is great to keep people interested. The close quarters is the map pack that kept me coming back the most, wasn't too sure about the others tbh.

It was metro for me but a lot of people didnt seem to like it as they struggled with tactics.

For me it was the ultimate map as it wasnt so big that you could creep around the edges to flank people, you had to go all out as a team to hold area B (in conquest) and that took a lot of working together.

i also didnt care about being called a noob for setting up a heavy machine gun on a bi-pod and nailing people left, right and center. if those kind of players dont think thats a sensible tactic and one used in real situations then they are dumb as buggery, i could hold back the opposition across large areas of the map and allow my team mates to attack - common sense no?